|
Good news, bad news
By Kamran Shafi
Tuesday, 23 Feb, 2010
THERE is much news for our great military strategists, both very
good and very bad indeed. First the good news. The high command
of the Pakistan Army needn’t overly worry about the Afghan army
‘taking on’ Pakistan in the foreseeable future.
Here is part of a report in Sunday’s New York Times regarding
the ongoing fighting in Marja:
“Scenes from this corner of the battlefield, observed over eight
days … suggest that the day when the Afghan army will be well
led and able to perform complex operations independently …
remains far off. The effort to train the Afghan army has long
been troubled, with soldiers and officers repeatedly falling
short. And yet after nearly a decade of American and European
mentorship and many billions of dollars of American taxpayer
investment, American and Afghan officials have portrayed the
Afghan army as the force out front in this important offensive
against the Taliban.
“Statements from Kabul have said the Afghan military is planning
the missions and leading both the fight and the effort to engage
with Afghan civilians caught between the Taliban and the newly
arrived troops. But that assertion conflicts with what is
visible in the field. In every engagement between the Taliban
and one front-line American Marine unit, the operation has been
led in almost every significant sense by American officers and
troops. They organised the forces for battle, transported them
in American vehicles and helicopters from western-run bases into
Taliban-held ground, and have been the primary fighting force
each day.
“The Afghan National Army, or ANA, has participated. At the
squad level it has been a source of effective, if modestly
skilled, manpower. Its soldiers have shown courage and a
willingness to fight … by all other important measures, though —
from transporting troops, directing them in battle and
coordinating fire support to arranging modern communications,
logistics, aviation and medical support — the mission in Marja
has been a Marine operation conducted in the presence of
fledgling Afghan army units, whose officers and soldiers follow
behind the Americans and do what they are told.
“That fact raises questions about President Obama’s declared
goal of beginning to withdraw American forces in July 2011 and
turning over security to the Afghan military and the even more
troubled police forces. There have been ample examples in the
offensive of weak Afghan leadership and poor discipline to boot
… no Marine officer had seen an Afghan use a map or plan a
complicated patrol. In another indicator of marginal military
readiness, the Afghan platoon had no weapons heavier than a
machinegun or a rocket-propelled grenade.
“Afghan officers organised no indirect fire support whatsoever
in the week of fighting. All supporting fire — air strikes,
rockets, artillery and mortars — was coordinated by Marines. The
Afghans also relied entirely on the American military for
battlefield resupply. Moreover, in multiple fire fights in which
Times journalists were present, many Afghan soldiers did not aim
— they pointed their American-issued M-16 rifles in the rough
direction of the incoming small-arms fire and pulled their
triggers without putting rifle sights to their eyes. Their rifle
muzzles were often elevated several degrees high.”
So there, gentlemen, you can breathe a little easy: the Afghan
army is not about to ‘take on’ Pakistan any time soon.
But, now for the bad news. In addition to what the NYT reporters
say about questions being raised about the start of an American
withdrawal in July 2011, Centcom chief Gen Petraeus has clearly
said in NBC TV’s Meet the Press programme, also on Sunday, that
the Marja operation is only “the ‘initial salvo’ in a military
campaign that could last 12 to 18 months”.
Eighteen months from now, gentlemen, takes us to August 2011. If
the ‘military campaign’ ends in August, by when will the
Americans withdraw please, after they have handed over to the
non-existent Afghan army? And since when have deadlines such as
these which have to do with operations, ever been met in
military history? So no strategic depth very soon either, sirs,
so stand easy use hanky.
A little on strategic depth in Afghanistan before we go on to
yet another ludicrous matter. And that is the fact that of the
total Afghan population 42 per cent are Pakhtuns and 58 per cent
Tajik, Hazara, Uzbek, Aimak, Turkmen, Baloch and others. The
‘strategic depth’ policies of the Pakistani state specially
under army dictators, has seen to it that let alone the others
who actively dislike us, even a majority of the Afghan Pakhtun
are not very fond of us. So there! I suppose the brass hats can
take it easy on that front too.
And now for Mullah Brother! Where the blazes was this man just
three weeks ago? We were told soon after his arrest that the ISI
took action when the Americans gave it ‘accurate’ information.
As a Pakistani who has seen the shenanigans of the ISI for well
on 40 years, what I should like to ask is why the omnipotent
Mother of All Agencies did not know where the ‘director-general
military operations’ of the Afghan Taliban was, by its self? Why
did (unwelcome, remember?) foreigners have to give this
‘premier’ agency information on the mullah which led to his
arrest?
As an aside, a request to their lordships of the Supreme Court
who have just recently humbled an elected government all ends
up. The ISPR has announced that whilst promotions of generals
are to be ratified by the government, it is the army chief’s
very own prerogative to give extensions to whichever general he
wills. Suo motu notice, my lords? For, after all, all the organs
of state are to remain within their own constitutional limits.
Mushism of the week: “You should come to Pakistan — it’s the
most happening place in the world, where there’s never a dull
moment” – Gen Pervez Musharraf, London, Feb 15, 2010. The man
ought to be ashamed of himself to refer to our unfortunate
country in the way that he did, where tens of people die
violently every single day at the hands of the demons let loose
by himself and others of his ilk. Happening place indeed. Why
doesn’t he himself come back? |